Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Editorial Review Board"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday December 02, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (Cleanup) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Nominations for Editorial Review Board consideration may be made under the line below. Please be sure that you are the author of the article in question, and sign your name with four tildés, as: '''<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>'''. The first article below (about Naval Architecture) serves as an example. | + | Nominations for '''Editorial Review Board''' consideration may be made under the line below. Please be sure that you are the author of the article in question, and sign your name with four tildés, as: '''<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>'''. The first article below (about Naval Architecture) serves as an example. |
<br> | <br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I would appreciate the consideration of the ERB on article [[Naval architecture in the Industrial Age]]. Thank you! --[[User:Gkohs|Gkohs]] 22:37, 14 January 2007 (PST) | I would appreciate the consideration of the ERB on article [[Naval architecture in the Industrial Age]]. Thank you! --[[User:Gkohs|Gkohs]] 22:37, 14 January 2007 (PST) | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Boxing== | ||
| + | I would like to nominate [[Boxing]] for ERB. [[User:Garrett|Garrett]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :ERB articles are primarily academic. It's where we plan on placing & protecting published research papers. ERB provides both author attribution and avoids the types of edits/reverts/deletions taking place at Wikipedia. [[User:Snerfling|Snerfling]] 15:38, 11 February 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Garrett, the fact the first few sentences of your [[Boxing]] article mimic those in Wikipedia's article of the same subject would present Centiare with all kinds of [[Centiare:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License|GFDL]] licensing and copyright problems, if we were to "protect" the contribution from further editing. It looks like you've implemented the "Aficionados" section nicely, so this will hopefully be sufficient reward for your helpful efforts on [[Boxing]]. If you see my article about [[Naval architecture in the Industrial Age]], this was written from scratch as a take-home "mid-term exam" essay during my graduate studies. Thus, it's entirely my own work, and therefore presents no problem with "protection" outside the bounds of the GFDL. You know how Wikipedia has a rule about "no original research"? Well, the ERB is actually '''looking''' for it. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 10:12, 12 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:18, 26 December 2007
Nominations for Editorial Review Board consideration may be made under the line below. Please be sure that you are the author of the article in question, and sign your name with four tildés, as: --~~~~. The first article below (about Naval Architecture) serves as an example.
I would appreciate the consideration of the ERB on article Naval architecture in the Industrial Age. Thank you! --Gkohs 22:37, 14 January 2007 (PST)
Boxing
I would like to nominate Boxing for ERB. Garrett
- ERB articles are primarily academic. It's where we plan on placing & protecting published research papers. ERB provides both author attribution and avoids the types of edits/reverts/deletions taking place at Wikipedia. Snerfling 15:38, 11 February 2007 (PST)
- Garrett, the fact the first few sentences of your Boxing article mimic those in Wikipedia's article of the same subject would present Centiare with all kinds of GFDL licensing and copyright problems, if we were to "protect" the contribution from further editing. It looks like you've implemented the "Aficionados" section nicely, so this will hopefully be sufficient reward for your helpful efforts on Boxing. If you see my article about Naval architecture in the Industrial Age, this was written from scratch as a take-home "mid-term exam" essay during my graduate studies. Thus, it's entirely my own work, and therefore presents no problem with "protection" outside the bounds of the GFDL. You know how Wikipedia has a rule about "no original research"? Well, the ERB is actually looking for it. --MyWikiBiz 10:12, 12 February 2007 (PST)
