Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday December 02, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 94: Line 94:
 
== Argument ==
 
== Argument ==
  
* There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of  a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
+
My argument for unblocking is very simple, as follows.
* My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
 
  
I will justify this by showing some of the problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.
+
 
 +
*(Major premiss) There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of  a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
 +
* (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
 +
 
 +
The major premiss is clear.  Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project.  To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and criticise some FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.
  
 
== Blocks of Peter Damian ==
 
== Blocks of Peter Damian ==

Revision as of 10:22, 19 September 2008

Evidence for the Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee (September 2008)

Peter Damian Background

Work in progress

Mathematics, logic and set theory

Philosophical Logic

Medieval philosophy and logic

Aristotle

Biographies

Gospel music

Argument

My argument for unblocking is very simple, as follows.


  • (Major premiss) There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
  • (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.

The major premiss is clear. Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project. To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and criticise some FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.

Blocks of Peter Damian

Relevant accounts

Block logs =

Relevant Blocks

  • 4 December 2007 Radiant! (Smear campaign)
  • 6 December 2007 WJBscribe (legal threat)
  • 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)
  • 13 August 2008 (MBisanz - personal attack or harassment)
  • 01:45, 31 August 2008 by Coren (incivility)
  • 23:11, 6 September 2008 by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

4 December 2007

6 December 2007

WJBscribe (legal threat)

29 June 2008

Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)

13 August 2008

(MBiszanz - personal attack or harassment)

31 August 2008

by Coren (incivility)

6 September 2008

  • by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

Criticism of FT2