Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday December 02, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 86: Line 86:
 
* My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
 
* My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
  
To justify this I will need to explain exactly why I have a problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.
+
I will justify this by showing some of the problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.
  
 
== Blocks of Peter Damian ==
 
== Blocks of Peter Damian ==

Revision as of 07:21, 19 September 2008

Evidence for the Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee (September 2008)

Peter Damian Background

Work in progress

Mathematics, logic and set theory

Philosophical Logic

Medieval philosophy and logic

Classical Philosophy


Biographies

Gospel music

Argument

  • There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
  • My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.

I will justify this by showing some of the problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.

Blocks of Peter Damian

Relevant accounts

Blocks

Damian blocks Renamed user 4 blocks

  • 4 December 2007 Radiant! (Smear campaign)
  • 6 December 2007 WJBscribe (legal threat)
  • 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)
  • 13 August 2008 (MBiszanz - personal attack or harassment)
  • 01:45, 31 August 2008 bu Coren (incivility)
  • 23:11, 6 September 2008 by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

Criticism of FT2